|
|
VOTING PARADOX: The observation that voting by a relatively small group of people might generate a intransitive or inconsistent ranking of three or more alternatives, creating a paradox of rankings. The preferences of rational individuals are generally assumed to transitive and consistent, that is, if a person prefers A to B and B to C, then the person also prefers A to C. However, the preferences of group of voters might not be consistent. That is, as a group, voters might prefer A to B and B to C, but then prefer C to A. This is not only paradoxical and confusing, it also can be inefficient.
Visit the GLOSS*arama
|
|

|
|
|
COMPLEMENT GOOD In general, one of two (or more) goods that are related in a joint manner. In terms of demand, complement goods are those that provide satisfaction of a want or need when consumed together. In terms of supply, complement goods are those that are simultaneously produced using a given resource. A complement good is one of two ways that goods are related. The other is a substitute good.
Complete Entry | Visit the WEB*pedia |


|
|
BROWN PRAGMATOX [What's This?]
Today, you are likely to spend a great deal of time strolling through a department store looking to buy either a how-to book on home decorating or a set of luggage with wheels. Be on the lookout for the happiest person in the room. Your Complete Scope
This isn't me! What am I?
|
|
|
Ragnar Frisch and Jan Tinbergen were the 1st Nobel Prize winners in Economics in 1969.
|
|
|
"As is our confidence, so is our capacity. " -- William Hazlitt, essayist
|
|
DJA Dow Jones Averages
|
|
|
Tell us what you think about AmosWEB. Like what you see? Have suggestions for improvements? Let us know. Click the User Feedback link.
User Feedback
|

|