|
|
VOTING PARADOX: The observation that voting by a relatively small group of people might generate a intransitive or inconsistent ranking of three or more alternatives, creating a paradox of rankings. The preferences of rational individuals are generally assumed to transitive and consistent, that is, if a person prefers A to B and B to C, then the person also prefers A to C. However, the preferences of group of voters might not be consistent. That is, as a group, voters might prefer A to B and B to C, but then prefer C to A. This is not only paradoxical and confusing, it also can be inefficient.
Visit the GLOSS*arama
|
|

|
|
|
PRIVATE GOODS Goods characterized by rival consumption and the ability to exclude nonpayers. Private goods are one of four types of goods differentiated by consumption rivalry and nonpayer excludability. The other three goods are public (nonrival consumption and nonpayers cannot be excluded), common-property (rival consumption and nonpayers cannot be excluded), and near-public (nonrival consumption and nonpayers can be excluded). Rival consumption and the ease of excluding of nonpayers means private goods can be efficiently exchanged through markets.
Complete Entry | Visit the WEB*pedia |


|
|
GRAY SKITTERY [What's This?]
Today, you are likely to spend a great deal of time surfing the Internet trying to buy either a rechargeable flashlight or storage boxes for your computer software CDs. Be on the lookout for pencil sharpeners with an attitude. Your Complete Scope
This isn't me! What am I?
|
|
|
A lump of pure gold the size of a matchbox can be flattened into a sheet the size of a tennis court!
|
|
|
"You are younger today than you will ever be again. Make use of it for the sake of tomorrow. " -- Norman Cousins, editor
|
|
L/O Letter of Offer
|
|
|
Tell us what you think about AmosWEB. Like what you see? Have suggestions for improvements? Let us know. Click the User Feedback link.
User Feedback
|

|