|
|
VOTING PARADOX: The observation that voting by a relatively small group of people might generate a intransitive or inconsistent ranking of three or more alternatives, creating a paradox of rankings. The preferences of rational individuals are generally assumed to transitive and consistent, that is, if a person prefers A to B and B to C, then the person also prefers A to C. However, the preferences of group of voters might not be consistent. That is, as a group, voters might prefer A to B and B to C, but then prefer C to A. This is not only paradoxical and confusing, it also can be inefficient.
Visit the GLOSS*arama
|
|
|
|
|
NEAR-PUBLIC GOODS Goods characterized by nonrival consumption and the ability to exclude nonpayers. Near-public goods are one of four types of goods differentiated by consumption rivalry and nonpayer excludability. The other three goods are near-public (rival consumption and nonpayers can be excluded), public (nonrival consumption and nonpayers cannot be excluded), and common-property (rival consumption and nonpayers cannot be excluded). The ease of excluding of nonpayers means near-public goods can be exchanged through markets, but nonrival consumption means efficiency can only be achieved with government intervention.
Complete Entry | Visit the WEB*pedia |
|
|
BROWN PRAGMATOX
[What's This?]
Today, you are likely to spend a great deal of time watching the shopping channel seeking to buy either a large red and white striped beach towel or a bottle of blackcherry flavored spring water. Be on the lookout for crowded shopping malls.
Your Complete Scope
This isn't me! What am I?
|
|
|
The first paper notes printed in the United States were in denominations of 1 cent, 5 cents, 25 cents, and 50 cents.
|
|
|
"It is only our deeds that reveal who we are. " -- Carl Jung, psychiatrist
|
|
ADV PMT
Advance Payment
|
|
|
Tell us what you think about AmosWEB. Like what you see? Have suggestions for improvements? Let us know. Click the User Feedback link.
User Feedback
|
|
